I guess 2012 is the year of the pious underdog. After Tim Tebow and Jeremy Lin alighted their respective leagues, it seems that Rick Santorum may well be the Republican nominee. In one of my first articles on the site, I argued that Rick Santorum wasn't a credible candidate and was essentially running for Vice-President. At the time I recognized that the Republican base was fickle, but I couldn't imagine that Santorum would end up becoming the Anti-Romney. It appears to be a great quirk of fate, Santorum's candidacy flew under the radar until a couple days before Iowa, leaving him immune to scrutiny from the media and his fellow candidates.
Santorum's win in Iowa provided him with a big boost, but he wasn't yet a major candidate. However, the win allowed him to stick around in the race while other also-rans fled from the race like rats on a sinking ship. He weathered Newt Gingrich's calls to withdraw, and when the race shrank to 4 candidates, Santorum began to seem more attractive. In another blog I compared Romney and Gingrich to Twain's Duke and Dauphain. In contrast, Santorum and Ron Paul came off as beacons of honesty and integrity. While you can bash the media for ignoring Dr. Paul, his politics are simply too divergent from the mainstream of the Republican Party for him to ever become the nominee.
And thus, Santorum became more and more attractive. He began scoring points in the debates, and started to gain traction. Following his big wins in last Tuesday's contests, he raised a bunch of money, and he became the proverbial Anti-Romney. A series of recent polls show that his ascendence might be for real. A number of polls show him with a slight lead over Romney nationally, and more jarringly for the Romney campaign, some polls show him leading Romney in Michigan. Michigan is one of Romney's 'home states,' his father ran for governor there, and he scored a big win there in 2008. However, he had written an Op-ed piece during the Detroit bailout that argued that American automotive manufacturing ought to be allowed to fail. Combined with Santorum's support of manufacturing, he says that manufacturing should be immune from taxes, Michigan becomes a state ripe for Santorum's taking. If Romney loses in Michigan it may be his death knell. His campaign has survived on a combination of inevitability and money, as opposed to voter sentiment. As the veneer of his inevitability is stripped away, voters are fleeing from his campaign.
Of course the long knives have started to come out against Santorum. A link on today's Drudge Report links to an article called Time to Take Down Santorum's Disguise. The article is simply a list of all of Santorum's supposed crimes against conservatism. It's an incredibly lengthy list and can be accessed here: http://www.dailypaul.com/213706/time-to-take-down-santorums-disguise. In Santorum's defense, a lot of his anti-conservative votes were during the Bush era, and he was merely being a good party stooge. As I said last Friday, to think that any of these candidates isn't sufficiently conservative is ludicrous, all of the remaining candidates are extremists. The Republican's demand for ideological purity may well imperil their chances in November, and they risk becoming a more marginalized party if they can't accept some variety amongst their base.
Showing posts with label GOP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GOP. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Friday, February 10, 2012
CPAC and the Attacks on Romney's Conservatism
Only have time for a short post, because like Mr. Smith I'm taking my talents to Washington. I'll be appearing at CPAC, where presumably I will become the Republican frontrunner.
In 2008 Mitt Romney went to CPAC as the conservative alternative to John McCain. He bowed out and the party began to coalesce around Mr. McCain. It says all you need to know about the 2012 Republican campaign that the last conservative alternative is now the milquetoast moderate. It's conventional wisdom that the three candidates besides Mr. Romney are running to his right, but that perception seems slightly askew. In his rhetoric Mr. Romney normally offers equally or more conservative positions on all the issues as the rest of the field. It seems to me that the other candidates are running as the none disingenuous, articulate, and relatable alternative to Romney. The candidates attack his conservatism, specifically they point to Romneycare and his various flipflops, but what they are really attacking is his integrity. It seems ridiculous to think that Romney is some sort of Manchurian candidate, laying in wait to unleash his radical leftist ideology on America, and I don't think the rest of the Republican field believes that. They use an attack on his conservative identity to attack his personality. With all of this talk of political PACS, I'm reminded of 2pac, because these candidates seem desperate to assert their conservative 'street cred'.
The candidates have come out swinging thus far at the conference as the tenor of the race devolves into ad hominem attacks. Saturday marks the completion of the Maine Caucus which is projected to go well for Mr. Paul and Mr. Romney. After that the next couple of races aren't until the 28th and because they are supposedly solidly in Mr. Romney's camp they shouldn't have a clarifying effect on the state of the race. The forecast calls for stormy weather in the Republican field until Super Tuesday, March 6th, at the earliest. If this was Groundhog's day Punxatawny Phil wouldn't have seen his shadow, or perhaps he would've because I can't recall off top which signifies more inclement weather.
In 2008 Mitt Romney went to CPAC as the conservative alternative to John McCain. He bowed out and the party began to coalesce around Mr. McCain. It says all you need to know about the 2012 Republican campaign that the last conservative alternative is now the milquetoast moderate. It's conventional wisdom that the three candidates besides Mr. Romney are running to his right, but that perception seems slightly askew. In his rhetoric Mr. Romney normally offers equally or more conservative positions on all the issues as the rest of the field. It seems to me that the other candidates are running as the none disingenuous, articulate, and relatable alternative to Romney. The candidates attack his conservatism, specifically they point to Romneycare and his various flipflops, but what they are really attacking is his integrity. It seems ridiculous to think that Romney is some sort of Manchurian candidate, laying in wait to unleash his radical leftist ideology on America, and I don't think the rest of the Republican field believes that. They use an attack on his conservative identity to attack his personality. With all of this talk of political PACS, I'm reminded of 2pac, because these candidates seem desperate to assert their conservative 'street cred'.
The candidates have come out swinging thus far at the conference as the tenor of the race devolves into ad hominem attacks. Saturday marks the completion of the Maine Caucus which is projected to go well for Mr. Paul and Mr. Romney. After that the next couple of races aren't until the 28th and because they are supposedly solidly in Mr. Romney's camp they shouldn't have a clarifying effect on the state of the race. The forecast calls for stormy weather in the Republican field until Super Tuesday, March 6th, at the earliest. If this was Groundhog's day Punxatawny Phil wouldn't have seen his shadow, or perhaps he would've because I can't recall off top which signifies more inclement weather.
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Santorum Surges; Romney Relapses
The following post appeared on The Faster Times earlier today. I'd just like to add a small addendum; I think I've finally figured out the key to Mitt's weakness. In his concession speech last night, with the Colorado count still in question Mitt said something to the effect of "I think we will come in 1st or 2nd when all the votes are in." It's this kind of equivocation that illustrates his weakness, Republicans want someone with balls who doesn't let harsh facts get in the way of portraying a happy message. Think back to Ronald Reagan, who in response to being caught in a lie said "My heart and my best intentions tell me that’s true, but the facts and evidence tell me it is not." This is the kind of thing Republicans eat up, Romney should've just declared victory in Colorado and tried to spin the night in a positive way.
Now on to our regularly scheduled broadcast:
Last night, Rick Santorum pulled off a fairly surprising sweep in Colorado, Minnesota, and Missouri. Santorum built momentum in the previous week following Mitt Romney’s gaffe about the very poor and Newt Gingrich’s bizarre ramblings. Romney’s misstep, besides playing poorly with Democrats and Independents, also angered Conservatives. Sensitive to the charge that they don’t care about the poor, Conservatives don’t want to cede ground to Democrats. Moreover, Romney’s assertion that the poor have a safety net sounded like nails on a chalkboard; Republicans instead want to hear a stirring defense of Conservatism and Capitalism. They want to hear that their economic policies will lift up every American and not allow some folks to stay on the public dole. Romney’s statement further alienated Conservatives who just don’t believe that he’s one of them. His inability to articulate the conservative economic message is a lasting issue and may doom his chances, whether in the Primary or the General.
Also aiding Santorum were last week’s high profile battles over social values. The Planned Parenthood decision by the Komen Foundation and the ruling that Catholic hospitals were required to provide contraception restoked the flames of long burning values wars. These issues are Santorum’s bread and butter and he’s able to connect with voters and tap into their resentment. Romney, and Gingrich to a lesser extent, just aren’t able to speak with the same forcefulness on these issues as Santorum.
Of Santorum’s three wins last night, Missouri is the least important. Because of a strange quirk, Missouri’s primary was essentially a glorified poll and delegates will actually be chosen in a mid-March caucus. Santorum had figured that Missouri could be his for the taking; it has a strong evangelical base, Newt Gingrich was absent from the ballot, and Romney wasn’t dedicating many resources to winning it. Still, Santorum’s win had some significance. While turnout was way below 2008 numbers, roughly 250,000 people went to the polls. Santorum had a dominant win, doubling up Romney, while passing the elusive 50% barrier. A meaningless primary means that only the diehards will turnout, a fact that favored Santorum. Social values voters flocked to the polls and gave him a big win.
Santorum had a more meaningful win in Minnesota. Minnesota was seen as a tossup going into it and polls predicted a modest Santorum win. Instead, he cruised to victory, finishing 18% in front of Ron Paul. Minnesota’s Republican party is made up of Christian conservatives, such as Michelle Bachmann, and Libertarians. Despite the lack of his ideal conservative voter and Minnesota’s history of picking outsiders (Jesse Ventura won the governorship as an Independent in 1998), Romney still had high hopes. He was endorsed by his former opponent, Governor Tim Pawlenty, and he had scored a big win there in 2008. Instead, he finished a weak 3rd behind Santorum and Dr. Paul. Romney saw his real vote total drop by about 17,000 votes and his share of the vote drop by about 25%. This is where last night’s results get especially troubling for Romney. If he was able to have such success in the state as John McCain was sailing to the nomination, how can he explain his precipitous drop? An oft quoted number in this election cycle has been that 54% of voters say that the more they get to know Romney, the less they like him. In Minnesota we see proof positive of that fact.
In Colorado we see evidence of the same. Colorado was supposed to be in the bag for Romney last night. Polls predicted a nine point Romney win and instead he lost by 5%, a sharp decline from his 2008 success. In 2008 Romney won 60% of the vote. Last night he won just 35% and saw his vote total drop by about 20,000 real votes. Colorado was the biggest upset last night and it should really trouble the Romney campaign. Despite the facts that Colorado has a substantial Christian Conservative edge (Focus on the Family is headquartered there), it was still supposed to be in Romney’s western wheelhouse. The fact that voters are essentially fleeing the Romney camp cannot bode well for the sense of inevitably his campaign has been advancing.
Let’s get this point out of the way, Newt Gingrich is done. Gingrich’s strength lay in his ability to rage against Democratic strawmen and the fact that he’s not Mitt Romney. Well, it appears Republicans have decided that being not Newt Gingrich is almost as big a virtue as being not Mitt Romney. With Ron Paul appealing only to a very specific sector of the party, it is now a very good time to be Rick Santorum.
But how potentially strong is Santorum? Many in the east coast elite circles I run in see Santorum as a joke. He’s known for his gay bashing and the eponymous scatological phrase it has spawned. But he has an ability to connect with voters; he was able to win a senatorial campaign in Pennsylvania in 2000 as the state was voting for Al Gore. When Santorum speaks he sounds earnest, a sharp contrast to both Romney and Gingrich. Also, Santorum may be more moderate than many like to admit. He comes from the George Bush school of “compassionate conservatism” and that will play better with many voters than Romney who brags about not caring about the poor.
Still, the name of the game is money and Santorum doesn’t have enough, yet. It’s a testament to his political skill that he’s made it this far, winning four of the first eight Republican races, while getting outspent ten to one by Romney and more marginally, yet still significantly, by Paul and Gingrich. Perhaps his big night will inspire more donations as social conservatives are a community that is willing to give. After his Iowa win, I compared Santorum to Tim Tebow, and just like Tebow, Santorum has managed to string together a couple surprising wins.
And what of Mr. Romney? Mitt had a terrible night, made worse by the fact that he was attacked by a would be “glitter” bomber who was stopped by Mitt’s Secret Service detail. There is something poetic about the fact that Romney has a security detail. He has all the accoutrements of a successful candidate — the looks, the money, the security detail — and yet he has none of the successes. Romney should be very scared by the fact that his real vote totals are evaporating in states where he’s had prior success.
The Republican attitude seems to be a pox on both their houses. Conservative Blogger Erick Erickson endorsed “The Sweet Meteor of Death” for president, and seems to be openly pining for a brokered convention. Turnout was way down in all three contests, which is not the sign of a party enthusiastic about any of their choices. Republicans love to point to the Democratic battle of 2008 as reason why a long process is not fatal. But in 2008 the Democrats saw turnout increase, while the Republicans see turnout plunging. It seems like we’re in it for the long haul. At this point I wouldn’t be stunned to see all four candidates take the battle to the convention. All the while, President Obama is surely sitting in the White House thanking his Kenyan Muslim God that he won’t have to run against a tough challenger. All four candidates have significant liabilities and shouldn’t pose too serious a threat to him in November.
Now on to our regularly scheduled broadcast:
Last night, Rick Santorum pulled off a fairly surprising sweep in Colorado, Minnesota, and Missouri. Santorum built momentum in the previous week following Mitt Romney’s gaffe about the very poor and Newt Gingrich’s bizarre ramblings. Romney’s misstep, besides playing poorly with Democrats and Independents, also angered Conservatives. Sensitive to the charge that they don’t care about the poor, Conservatives don’t want to cede ground to Democrats. Moreover, Romney’s assertion that the poor have a safety net sounded like nails on a chalkboard; Republicans instead want to hear a stirring defense of Conservatism and Capitalism. They want to hear that their economic policies will lift up every American and not allow some folks to stay on the public dole. Romney’s statement further alienated Conservatives who just don’t believe that he’s one of them. His inability to articulate the conservative economic message is a lasting issue and may doom his chances, whether in the Primary or the General.
Also aiding Santorum were last week’s high profile battles over social values. The Planned Parenthood decision by the Komen Foundation and the ruling that Catholic hospitals were required to provide contraception restoked the flames of long burning values wars. These issues are Santorum’s bread and butter and he’s able to connect with voters and tap into their resentment. Romney, and Gingrich to a lesser extent, just aren’t able to speak with the same forcefulness on these issues as Santorum.
Of Santorum’s three wins last night, Missouri is the least important. Because of a strange quirk, Missouri’s primary was essentially a glorified poll and delegates will actually be chosen in a mid-March caucus. Santorum had figured that Missouri could be his for the taking; it has a strong evangelical base, Newt Gingrich was absent from the ballot, and Romney wasn’t dedicating many resources to winning it. Still, Santorum’s win had some significance. While turnout was way below 2008 numbers, roughly 250,000 people went to the polls. Santorum had a dominant win, doubling up Romney, while passing the elusive 50% barrier. A meaningless primary means that only the diehards will turnout, a fact that favored Santorum. Social values voters flocked to the polls and gave him a big win.
Santorum had a more meaningful win in Minnesota. Minnesota was seen as a tossup going into it and polls predicted a modest Santorum win. Instead, he cruised to victory, finishing 18% in front of Ron Paul. Minnesota’s Republican party is made up of Christian conservatives, such as Michelle Bachmann, and Libertarians. Despite the lack of his ideal conservative voter and Minnesota’s history of picking outsiders (Jesse Ventura won the governorship as an Independent in 1998), Romney still had high hopes. He was endorsed by his former opponent, Governor Tim Pawlenty, and he had scored a big win there in 2008. Instead, he finished a weak 3rd behind Santorum and Dr. Paul. Romney saw his real vote total drop by about 17,000 votes and his share of the vote drop by about 25%. This is where last night’s results get especially troubling for Romney. If he was able to have such success in the state as John McCain was sailing to the nomination, how can he explain his precipitous drop? An oft quoted number in this election cycle has been that 54% of voters say that the more they get to know Romney, the less they like him. In Minnesota we see proof positive of that fact.
In Colorado we see evidence of the same. Colorado was supposed to be in the bag for Romney last night. Polls predicted a nine point Romney win and instead he lost by 5%, a sharp decline from his 2008 success. In 2008 Romney won 60% of the vote. Last night he won just 35% and saw his vote total drop by about 20,000 real votes. Colorado was the biggest upset last night and it should really trouble the Romney campaign. Despite the facts that Colorado has a substantial Christian Conservative edge (Focus on the Family is headquartered there), it was still supposed to be in Romney’s western wheelhouse. The fact that voters are essentially fleeing the Romney camp cannot bode well for the sense of inevitably his campaign has been advancing.
Let’s get this point out of the way, Newt Gingrich is done. Gingrich’s strength lay in his ability to rage against Democratic strawmen and the fact that he’s not Mitt Romney. Well, it appears Republicans have decided that being not Newt Gingrich is almost as big a virtue as being not Mitt Romney. With Ron Paul appealing only to a very specific sector of the party, it is now a very good time to be Rick Santorum.
But how potentially strong is Santorum? Many in the east coast elite circles I run in see Santorum as a joke. He’s known for his gay bashing and the eponymous scatological phrase it has spawned. But he has an ability to connect with voters; he was able to win a senatorial campaign in Pennsylvania in 2000 as the state was voting for Al Gore. When Santorum speaks he sounds earnest, a sharp contrast to both Romney and Gingrich. Also, Santorum may be more moderate than many like to admit. He comes from the George Bush school of “compassionate conservatism” and that will play better with many voters than Romney who brags about not caring about the poor.
Still, the name of the game is money and Santorum doesn’t have enough, yet. It’s a testament to his political skill that he’s made it this far, winning four of the first eight Republican races, while getting outspent ten to one by Romney and more marginally, yet still significantly, by Paul and Gingrich. Perhaps his big night will inspire more donations as social conservatives are a community that is willing to give. After his Iowa win, I compared Santorum to Tim Tebow, and just like Tebow, Santorum has managed to string together a couple surprising wins.
And what of Mr. Romney? Mitt had a terrible night, made worse by the fact that he was attacked by a would be “glitter” bomber who was stopped by Mitt’s Secret Service detail. There is something poetic about the fact that Romney has a security detail. He has all the accoutrements of a successful candidate — the looks, the money, the security detail — and yet he has none of the successes. Romney should be very scared by the fact that his real vote totals are evaporating in states where he’s had prior success.
The Republican attitude seems to be a pox on both their houses. Conservative Blogger Erick Erickson endorsed “The Sweet Meteor of Death” for president, and seems to be openly pining for a brokered convention. Turnout was way down in all three contests, which is not the sign of a party enthusiastic about any of their choices. Republicans love to point to the Democratic battle of 2008 as reason why a long process is not fatal. But in 2008 the Democrats saw turnout increase, while the Republicans see turnout plunging. It seems like we’re in it for the long haul. At this point I wouldn’t be stunned to see all four candidates take the battle to the convention. All the while, President Obama is surely sitting in the White House thanking his Kenyan Muslim God that he won’t have to run against a tough challenger. All four candidates have significant liabilities and shouldn’t pose too serious a threat to him in November.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)